Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.

Introduced in 2014, genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) describes a variety of unpleasant genital, sexual and urinary symptoms that can either be isolated or coexisting and are not related to other medical conditions. GSM is a chronic and progressive condition that requires early recognition and appropriate management to preserve urogenital health. Despite the importance of early detection and treatment, the condition is consistently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Herein, we emphasize how to diagnose GSM in postmenopausal, hypoestrogenic, and hypoandrogenic women and summarize evidence-based treatments focusing on prescription treatments and adjunctive therapies.

Disparities in Cancer Specific and Overall Survival Outcomes in African Americans With Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis From the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate association of African-American race and survival in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer database for patients who underwent partial or radical (RN) nephrectomy. The cohort was divided into African American (AA) and non-African American (NAA) patients. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality. Multivariable Analysis and Kaplan-Meier Analysis were used to elucidate predictive factors and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Three thousand eight hundred and ninety-three patients were analyzed (AA, n = 564/NAA, n = 3329). AA had greater Stage I (73.8% vs 63.9%, P <.001) and papillary RCC (29.8% vs 8.5%, P <.001). Multivariable Analysis revealed increasing age (HR = 1.03, P <.001), AA (HR = 1.24, P = .027), higher stage (HR = 1.30-3.19, P <.001), RN (HR = 2.45, P <.001), clear cell (HR = 1.23, P <.001), positive margin (HR = 1.34, P .004), and high-grade (HR = 1.58, P <.001) to be associated with worsened all-cause mortality. Increasing age (HR = 1.02, P <.001), AA (HR = 1.48, P = .025), RN (HR = 2.98, P <.001), high-grade (HR = 3.11, P <.001), and higher stage (HR = 3.03-13.2, P <.001) were predictive for cancer-specific mortality. Kaplan-Meier Analysis revealed worsened 5-year overall survival for AA in stage I (80% vs 88%, P = .001), stage III (26% vs 70%, P = .001), and stage IV (23% vs 44%, P = .009). Five-year cancer-specific survival was worse for AA in stage III (36% vs 81%, P <.001) and stage IV (30% vs 49%, P = .007). CONCLUSION: Despite presenting with more indolent histology and lower stage, African-Americans were at greater risk for diminished survival, faring worse in overall survival for all stages and cancer-specific survival in for stage III/IV RCC. Further investigation into factors associated with these disparities is warranted.

Preoperative Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor for Adverse Oncologic Survival Outcomes for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis from the International Marker Consortium Renal Cancer (INMARC).

BACKGROUND: We sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Retrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated. The cohort was subdivided into 2 groups for analysis (normal CRP ≤5 mg/L; elevated CRP >5). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors. RESULTS: We analyzed 2445 patients (1641 male/804 female; normal CRP 1056/elevated CRP 1389; mean follow-up 36 months). Patients with elevated CRP had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .001), higher body mass index (P < .001), and larger tumor size (6.0 cm vs 3.9 cm; P < .001). MVA for RFS demonstrated elevated CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .005), tumor size (HR, 1.1; P < .001), and high tumor grade (HR, 3.1; P < .001) to be independent risk factors. For normal vs elevated CRP, KMA for RFS of stages 1-4 RCC revealed a 5-year RFS of 93% vs 88% (P = .001), 95% vs 83% (P = .163), 84% vs 62% (P = .001), and 58% vs 60% (P = .513), respectively. KMA MA KMA for OS of stages 1-4 RCC revealed a 5-year OS of 98% vs 81% (P = .001), 94% vs 80% (P = .103), 94% vs 65% (P = .001), and 99% vs 38% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment CRP was an independent predictor of RFS and OS in an international multicenter cohort of patients with RCC.

Implementing Continuous Quality Improvement in an Integrated Community Urology Practice: Lessons Learned.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of 2 different continuous quality improvement interventions in an integrated community urology practice. We specifically assessed the impact of audited physician feedback on improving physicians' adoption of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer (CaP) and adherence to a prostate biopsy time-out intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The electronic medical records of Genesis Healthcare Partners were analyzed between August 24, 2011 and September 30, 2020 to evaluate the performance of 2 quality interventions: audited physician feedback to improve active surveillance adoption in low-risk CaP patients, and audited physician feedback to promote adherence to an electronic medical records embedded prostate biopsy time-out template. Physician and Genesis Healthcare Partners group adherence to each quality initiative was compared before and after each intervention type using ANOVA testing. RESULTS: For active surveillance, we consistently saw an increase in active surveillance adoption for low risk CaP patients in association with continuous audited feedback (P < .001). Adherence to the prostate biopsy time-out template improved when audited feedback was provided (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of clinical guidelines into routine clinical practice remains challenging and poses an obstacle to the improvement of United States healthcare quality. Continuous quality improvement should be a dynamic process, and in our experience, audited feedback coupled with education is most effective.

Leveraging the Electronic Medical Record Improves Prostate Cancer Clinical Staging in a Community Urology Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical tumor staging is an important component of risk stratification, which is central in assessment and treatment of patients with prostate cancer. We evaluated the potential of an examination based tumor staging template embedded within the electronic medical record to improve consistency and clarity of clinical tumor staging. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis before template implementation (January to March 2017), followed by prospective analysis after implementation (April to August 2017). Physicians were educated on use and importance of the staging template prior to implementation. Assessment of digital rectal examination clarity included confident-explicit (cT stage documented), confident-implicit (stage inexplicit, cT stage interpreted) and unconfident (inability to discern cT stage). Clarity and consistency of tumor staging before and after template implementation were compared using a chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 573 biopsies were analyzed: 234 before template use (40%) and 339 after (60%). In men at risk for prostate cancer explicit staging increased from 16% to 60% (p <0.001) following implementation of the staging template. Overall staging (explicit plus implicit) increased (from 74% to 92%, p <0.001), while unconfident staging decreased (from 26% to 8%, p <0.001) after implementation. In men with positive biopsies (309) explicit staging increased (from 29% to 64%, p <0.001) and overall staging increased (from 76% to 92%, p <0.001), while unconfident staging decreased (from 24% to 8%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate prostate cancer clinical staging is important in risk stratification and treatment. We demonstrate the ability of a standardized, electronic medical record embedded, American Joint Committee on Cancer based template to improve the consistency and clarity of clinical staging in prostate cancer.

Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in pT3a Pathologically Upstaged Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of partial nephrectomy (PN) in setting of pT3a pathologic-upstaged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. We compared oncologic and functional outcomes of radical nephrectomy (RN) and PN in patients with upstaged pT3a RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with cT1-2N0M0 RCC upstaged to pT3a postoperatively. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, with secondary outcomes of overall survival and de novo estimated glomular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for oncologic outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) were obtained to elucidate survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 929 patients had pT3a upstaging (686 [72.6%] RN; 243 [25.7%] PN; mean follow-up, 48 months). Tumor size was similar (RN 7.7 cm vs. PN 7.3 cm; P = .083). PN had decreased ΔeGFR (6.1 vs. RN 19.4 mL/min/1.73m2; P < .001) and de novo eGFR < 60 (9.5% vs. 21%; P = .008). Multivariable analysis for recurrence showed increasing RENAL score (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; P < .001), clinical T stage (HR, 1.8; P < .001), positive margin (HR, 1.57; P = .009), and high grade (HR, 1.21; P = .01) to be independent predictors, whereas surgery was not (P = .076). KMA revealed 5-year recurrence-free survival for cT1-upstaged PN, cT1-upstaged RN, cT2-upstaged PN, and cT2-upstaged RN of 79%, 74%, 70%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001). KMA revealed 5-year overall survival for cT1-upstaged PN, cT1-upstaged RN, cT2-upstaged PN, and cT2-upstaged RN of 64%, 65.2%, 56.4%, and 55.2%, respectively (P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: In pathologically upstaged pT3a RCC, PN did not adversely affect risk of recurrence and provided functional benefit. Surgical decision-making in patients at risk for T3a upstaging should be individualized and driven by tumor as well as functional risks.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass is associated with improved trifecta outcome compared to open partial nephrectomy: a single surgeon comparative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Utilization of partial nephrectomy (PN) for T2 renal mass is controversial due to concerns regarding burden of morbidity, though most cited data are from open PN (OPN). We compared surgical quality and functional outcomes of RPN and OPN for clinical T2a renal masses (cT2aRM). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive patients [RPN 59/OPN 91] who underwent PN from July 2008 to June 2016. Main outcome was achievement of Trifecta [negative surgical margin, no major urologic complications, and ≥90% preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)]. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors of Trifecta attainment. RESULTS: Mean tumor size (RPN 7.9 vs. OPN 8.4 cm, p = 0.139) and median RENAL score (p = 0.361) were similar. No difference was noted for positive margins (RPN 3.4% vs. OPN 1.1%, p = 0.561), ΔeGFR (RPN - 6.2 vs. OPN - 7.8, p = 0.543), and ≥ 90% eGFR recovery (RPN 54.1% vs. OPN 47.2%, p = 0.504). RPN had lower blood loss (p = 0.015), hospital stay (p = 0.013), and Clavien ≥ 3 complications (RPN 5.1% vs. OPN 16.5%, p = 0.041). Trifecta rate was significantly higher in RPN (47.5% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.041). Multivariable analysis demonstrated decreasing RENAL score (OR 1.11, p < 0.001), RPN (OR 1.2, p = 0.013), and decreasing EBL (OR 1.02, p = 0.016) to be associated with Trifecta attainment. CONCLUSIONS: RPN provided similar functional and oncologic precision to OPN, while being associated with improvements in major complications, the latter of which was reflected in a higher rate of Trifecta achievement for RPN. RPN may be considered to be a first-line option for select patients with cT2aRM when feasible and safe.

Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: We compared renal functional outcomes of robotic (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a definite indication for nephron-sparing surgery. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis of OPN and RPN in patients with baseline ≥ CKD Stage III [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2] was performed. Primary outcome was change in eGFR (ΔeGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2) between preoperative and last follow-up with respect to RENAL nephrometry score group [simple (4-6), intermediate (7-9), complex (10-12)]. Secondary outcomes included eGFR decline > 50%. RESULTS: 728 patients (426 OPN, 302 RPN, mean follow-up 33.3 months) were analyzed. Similar RENAL score distribution (p = 0.148) was noted between groups. RPN had lower median estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), and hospital stay (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Median ischemia time (OPN 23.7 vs. RPN 21.5 min, p = 0.089), positive margin (p = 0.256), transfusion (p = 0.166), and 30-day complications (p = 0.208) were similar. For OPN vs. RPN, mean ΔeGFR demonstrated no significant difference for simple (0.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.328), intermediate (2.1 vs. 2.1, p = 0.384), and complex (4.9 vs. 6.1, p = 0.108). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that decreasing preoperative eGFR (OR 1.10, p = 0.001) and complex RENAL score (OR 5.61, p = 0.03) were independent predictors for eGFR decline > 50%. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 5-year freedom from eGFR decline > 50% of 88.6% for OPN and 88.3% for RPN (p = 0.724). CONCLUSIONS: RPN and OPN demonstrated similar renal functional outcomes when stratified by tumor complexity group. Increasing tumor age and tumor complexity were primary drivers associated with functional decline. RPN provides similar renal functional outcomes to OPN in appropriately selected patients.

Prostate Biopsy Complications: A Dual Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To measure prostate needle biopsy (PNB)-associated complications and place of treatment: inpatient hospitalization and outpatient treatment. An electronic medical record (EMR) data query is compared to a patient questionnaire survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2410 patients underwent 2588 biopsies and were evaluated for PNB-associated complications. Two approaches were used: (1) EMR analysis based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology coding and chart review; and (2) patient-reported questionnaire and chart review validation. Serious complications were defined as any complication leading to a related hospitalization, visit to the emergency department (ED), urgent care (UC), or doctor's office within 30 days of the biopsy. RESULTS: The EMR study revealed 69 (2.67%) serious complications leading to either hospitalization or treatment at an ED, UC, or doctor's office. Thirty serious complications led to hospitalization (1.16%), 14 patients (0.54%) were treated at the ED, 1 was managed at a UC (0.04%), and 24 (0.93%) were treated at the doctor's office. Of the 847 (35.1%) questionnaires considered appropriate for analysis, 36 (4.25%) reported treatment in either the hospital, ED, UC, or doctor's office. Nine patients (1.06%) reported being hospitalized within 30 days of the procedure, whereas 27 patients (3.19%) were treated in an outpatient setting, 8 (0.94%) at the ED, 3 (0.35%) at a UC, and 16 (1.89%) at the doctor's office. CONCLUSION: Our dual analysis study indicates a slightly greater than 1% incidence of hospitalization due to serious complications following PNB. Serious complications appear to be more frequently managed outside the hospital setting (ED, UC, and doctor's office).